Friday, February 5, 2010

LATEST FROM AVAAZ:

CHEVRON IN THE AMAZON: 
CLEAN IT UP!

















Oil giant Chevron is facing defeat in a lawsuit by the people of the Ecuadorian Amazon, seeking redress for its dumping billions of gallons of poisonous waste in the rainforest.

But the oil multinational has launched a last-ditch, dirty lobbying effort to derail the people’s case for holding polluters to account.

Chevron’s new chief executive John Watson knows his brand is under fire – let’s turn up the global heat. Sign the petition below urging Chevron to clean up their toxic legacy, and it will be delivered directly to the company´s headquarters, their shareholders and the US media! 

 
To John Watson, the new CEO of Chevron:
We urge you to demonstrate genuine commitment to environmental accountability and respect for human rights in all Chevron’s business practices. Instead of lobbying to evade your obligations, take full responsibility for what your corporation has done: clean up Chevron’s toxic legacy in Ecuador, compensate affected communities for the damage you have done to their lives and environment, and adopt new policies worldwide to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

Take action now:



Wednesday, February 3, 2010

RUMAH NOR ACTION ALERT



Urgent Appeal for Borneo Forest 

Defenders at Rumah Nor


Village head in front of his demolished house

Background: (From The Borneo Project)

On January 19, 2010 bulldozers backed by Sarawak 

state government agents demolished 39 houses in 

the Iban village of Rumah Nor in SarawakMalaysia.  

The demolition crew smashed the houses and all 

belongings in them, including stored food, leaving 

families without shelter in Malaysia’s rainy season. 

As dismayed residents confronted the demolition 

crew, state Land and Survey Department enforcement 

agents threatened to return and destroy remaining

homes. 

 

The Borneo Project condemns this unwarranted 

and ruthless destruction by state authorities. 

Villagers had no warning of the demolition, which

state agents ordered despite Rumah Nor’s pending 

legal appeal of a local judge’s ruling in favor of a 

company that wants the village’s land for 

development.

 

Residents of nearby communities and NGO supporters

joined the people of Rumah Nor to form a 

“human wall” blockade to confront state demolition 

crews.  Malaysian civil society organizations 

decried the unannounced destruction of village homes 

as heartless, barbaric and illegal.

 

On January 25, the community obtained a temporary 

injunction until February 9, 2010,  blocking resumed 

demolition.  On February 9 the village and its lawyers 

will present arguments in court to compel the 

state government to recognize their customary land rights, 

nullify the company’s provisional lease, and compensate 

villagers for destruction of their homes and property.

 

The company, Tatau Land Sendirian Berhad, is a subsidiary

of the ASSAR Group, a state-controlled investment holding 

corporation. Tatau Land holds a “provisional lease” for the 

village’s customary rights land at Sungai Sekabai. It intends 

to bulldoze existing homes, farms, forests 

and orchards to build a “new township”. 

 

Over the past decade, Rumah Nor has stood at the 

forefront of Borneo communities’ struggle to protect 

native forests and communal lands against reckless logging 

and plantation expansion, and the collusive politicians 

and companies who profit from it.  The village’s lawyers 

intend to sue the state agencies that issued the provisional 

lease, as well as Tatau Land itself, to gain definitive legal 

recognition of their customary land rights.  

 


In 2001, a landmark judgment by Sarawak’s High 

Court affirmed Rumah Nor’s Native Customary Rights 

over their inherited territory. In 2005, an appellate 

court overturned part of the 2001 state court ruling, 

but did not affect the basic principle of native 

communities’ customary land and forest rights. 

Village head Nor anak Nyawai, who initiated the 

village’s lawsuit, is among those whose homes were 

razed on January 19.  Many believe the demolitions and 

state officials’ extreme action are a reprisal for the village’s 

persistent legal challenges to state  efforts to evict them from 

their lands and forests.            

 

Fast-track development plans for the region around 

Rumah Nor’s land are linked to recently-unveiled schemes 

associated with the “Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy” 

(SCORE).  

SCORE is characterized by secretly developed plans for 

12 major new hydro-electric dams financed by a state corporation 

of China, in addition to the Bakun and Murum megadams 

already under construction. Accelerated road building would 

“open” a 70,000 square kilometer swathe of Borneo to more 

logging and oil palm plantations, and heavy industries including 

aluminum smelting and palm oil refining.  Some 600,000 people 

live in the SCORE region.  Dams, plantations and industrial

development associated with SCORE is likely to displace many 

thousands including indigenous Dayak communities

(Iban, Kayan, Kenyah, and Penan) that occupy much of the

rural area, which includes some of the world’s most 

biodiverse rainforests.

 


YOU CAN HELP CLICK HERE TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION!


This documentary was made in 2007 and 

gives a good background to the issue  




 

 

 

Monday, February 1, 2010

South Korea Planning Giant Eco Domes For New Nature Reserve


ecodomes1

Nobody ever talks about what nature reserves of the future will look like — but thanks to South Korea’s stunning new plans, we now have a pretty good idea.

The National Ecological Institute of South Korea recently released plans for a $113 million large-scale nature reserve, complete with an gorgeous series of eco domes, an education center, and an environmental think-tank.

Continue reading here

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

WHAT A WASTE

The government could have taken a giant leap forward to improve our environment and general well-being this week when they met to discuss two highly pertinent issues namely: what the new renewable energy tariff will be and secondly, whether to adopt a waste to energy strategy for solid waste management rather than continuing to use landfills.  

I'm sad to report however, that they only decided to take a miniscule step forward instead.
That came in the form of an increase in the renewable energy tariff  from 21 sen to 46 sen for converting waste to energy.  Even though  that sounds like a substantial increase, those who are already working in resource recovery say it's still not high enough to really induce companies into this sector and it's a lot less than the incentives the government have bestowed on the IPPs and those involved in the oil and gas industry over the years.

It's also interesting to note that the new tariff is less than many neighbouring governments have set for renewable energy: Indonesia - 60sen, Thailand - 65sen, Singapore - 70sen Cambodia - 48sen.   When it came to setting the tariff for solar energy however, the government showed, quite clearly, that they are not really that interested in this free and limitless source of energy.  At only 20 sen per KW hour, I can't imagine there will be to many companies falling over each other to compete in this arena because at this price, it will be unsustainable. 

When it came to the decision on whether to adopt the waste to energy concept nationwide they opted to do a study instead. 
Hello!  If you know that it's possible to convert garbage into electricity and you don't leap at that, and if you think that dumping it all on landfills is okay, what is your problem?

Part of the problem is that the government has already committed a lot of public money to landfill management companies and although they are talking about harnessing bio gas from the dumps, only a handfull of landfills have actually been designed and built to do this. Most of our landfills are not even lined properly and are leaking leachate into the water system. 

So why does the government seem so reluctant to change? From what I can see, it's because all the people who benefit from the present system have a lot to loose if the old system is transformed. The municipal solid waste business runs like a cartel and the main players see the introduction of the waste to energy concept as being a threat to the status quo; the end to all the mutual back-scratching and pocket-lining that has been going on undisturbed for years.

Waste to energy is a tried and tested technology that converts a large proportion of household waste into RDF (refuse derived fuel) which is then used as replacement fuel in cement kilns and steam turbines. When this is integrated with mechanical and biological processes, more than 80 percent of raw household waste can be recovered, recycled and reused.  Recycle Energy Sdn Bhd, who daily process 700 tons of Kajang's waste,  are currently supplying a large cement factory with this renewable green fuel and generating 8MW of electricity as well as making compost and recycling plastics and metals.  At a conservative estimate of 18,000 tons of waste per day from the whole country, we could be producing about 206 MWs of electricity. This would have three major benefits:
1. It would reduce dependence on timber and fossil fuel. 
2. It would eliminate landfills and
3. It would reduce our carbon footprint

All very pertinent things to be doing post Copenhagen I should have thought.  Wrong again! there are plans afoot right now to build huge coal power plants in Sabah and Sarawak and the whole issue of nuclear energy is still in contention.

Of course processing garbage isn't going to be able to supply all the power needs for the nation, but it can make a significant contribution.  What's required here is a down-sized holistic approach so that instead of thinking about garbage and power on a national scale, we start to think about it more from a local perspective;  smaller plants serving smaller populations and using a combination of technologies in line with BATNEC (best available technology at no excessive cost)  

The government could have taken a giant leap forward  to improve our environment and general well-being this week - but they didn't!




Sunday, January 24, 2010

MUST WATCH MOVIE



Finally got round to watching Yann Arthus-Bertrand's remarkable movie called HOME which contains stunning photography from all over the world.  

A must see for anyone interested in the future of our beautiful planet...and our species.  The movie is about an hour and a half long. 

SARAWAK BENT ON USING COAL FOR POWER

KUCHING: Sarawak could be producing more than 3,300MW of hydro power within the next three years and yet the state Barisan Nasional government is insisting it requires new coal-fire plants to generate more power.

The state’s Second Minister for Planning and Resource Management Awang Tengah Ali Hassan stunned environmentalist by stating that Sarawak needed coal-fired power to complement its hydro power generation, especially in Sarawak’s Corridor of Renewable Energy (Score) to meet high demand in energy-intensive industries.

“Yes, we know coal is not renewable energy,” he said in rebuking a claim by the Borneo Resources Institute that the Sarawak government had classified the mining and exploitation of coal reserves under the term of renewable energy projects.

“However, with the combination of resources, coal can be used a as a source of power generation to meet the high demand for power in the energy-intensive industries in the state,” he told reporters after officiating opening the Arcardia Apartments yesterday.


Continue reading here

Saturday, January 23, 2010

STENCH FROM THE DUMP



Aerial of Bukit Tagar landfill which is so stinky you can smell it from the PLUS highway turn-off and this is one of Selangor's showpieces!
 
I just had another little  foray into the wonderful world of garbage and discovered a couple of things that really disturb me:
1. Selayang Municipal Council pays between RM 2.5 -3 Million to Alam Flora per month for garbage collection and disposal, which calculated at 400 tons a day for 30 days equates to a payment of RM208 per ton. Then add on the RM30 per ton tipping fee at Bukit Tagar and we're talking RM238 per ton.  That's outrageous when you think what they (and the rate payers) are getting for their money.

2. I naively thought that garbage trucks were weighed as they arrived and left the landfill to determine the tonnage dumped and therefore the charge to the local authority. Apparently it doesn't work like that at all.  Most local authorities pay a fixed rate for waste collection and disposal so there's no incentive for the operators to actually take the garbage to the landfill which is presumably why there's so much illegal dumping everywhere...trying to maximise profits.

If there was a serious commitment on behalf of the government and local authorities to keep the environment free of garbage then the payment would be on a weight basis.  I believe this is the system in Sarawak and that as a result the garbage collectors are very diligent about making sure all the waste gets to a proper landfill site. Actually Sarawak seem to have got their solid waste management operating much more efficiently than over in the Peninsula...other local authorities please take note.

STOP LYNAS

STOP LYNAS